Paihia Community Council (continued)
Over the next few
years we worked on three developments: rating, planning and sewerage system.
When the time came for
the striking of the annual rates (the County Council let us do this ourselves)
we wanted to make sure that the people who used the services paid for
them. Being a tourist town, Paihia has
to provide amenities for tourists, which few of the locals need.
We found our answer in
differential rating, which had recently been approved by Parliament. When I had been in Wellington at a PPTA Conference in the
preceding months, I called in to the Local Government Department and talked to
the gentleman there about the differential rating rules. He said if we wanted to, we could charge a
different rate for houses with red rooves, and another for houses with green
rooves, and so on.
So I did some research
and some trial runs and eventually came up with a proposal that accommodation
businesses should pay twice the rates of residential properties, while other
businesses should pay 150% of the residential rate. We discussed this in the
council, on the basis that this would reflect the usage of the tourist
amenities, because tourists were the ones who used the motels, while we all
shared the shops.
The proposal was
approved by the Community Council and the County gave it the rubber stamp. Some
residential ratepayers found themselves with a lower rates bill; the commercial
people were reasonably happy to carry their share and the residents were delighted.

By this time I was
attending the County Council meetings each month; chairs of community councils
were allowed to attend and speak but not, of course, to vote. I rarely spoke
unless asked, preferring to defer to the local County Council member, who was
our old colleague, Les Eden. But I chatted with the members over lunch and this
kept us in the loop of council affairs. I particularly enjoyed getting to know
Jim Henare.
No comments:
Post a Comment