The
starting point for research about family names is the Oxford Dictionary of Surnames.
There we find the name GAZE listed with a range of variants, like Gace, Haze,
Gayes, Hayes, Wace, Wasey, Gears, Waswo – and so on.
These variations are
caused by the spelling of Old and Middle English which used symbols and sounds
we no longer have in modern English. The letter pronounced like a rough H
looked similar to G, so it is not surprising that Gs and Hs got confused. And the letter W was spelled with a G in
Norman-French (cf war/guerre or ward and guard), so you could have a variant
starting with W.
Similarly, R could be
confused with Y or even P, so Gears and Gayes could look very similar in an Old
English document.
![]() |
Coastal erosion near houses at Happisburgh |
The spelling of
Happisburgh is because people mistook a double Y for a double P so what was
originally HAYYISBURGH became written HAPPISBURGH. There is another Hazebrouk
in northern France ,
which I assume has the same origin.
If you look in the
local histories and authorities for an explanation of the name HUCCLECOTE
no-one seems to know where it came from. Some say UCHEL+COED meaning a wooded
hill, but others dispute this.
-COTE is a common ending for placenames in England (Northcote, Wattcote and so
on) and means an enclosure (dovecote, sheepcote). It is probably the same as the ending KOT in
Indian placenames (eg Pathankot, Rajkot ). My guess is that it referred to a more
substantial enclosure like a fort.



Happis as we have seen
is pronounced Haze (or Gaze), and one of the earliest forms of the name is
“Gears” or Hears, which I take to be a corruption (?) of HERR, the German word
for Master, Lord, Leader, Boss, etc So
Happisburgh would be the fortress of the leader, say, of a Viking or pirate
gang or family. Cf Mafia families.
My suggestion is
therefore that both Hucclecote and Happisburgh mean “the home of the leader”,
or “the Boss’s Place”, and that the name Gaze is derived from HERR, meaning
leader.
I cannot prove it
beyond doubt, so the lawyers can still argue, but I think it is plausible and
credible and that’s OK by me!
(This is the first of what I hope will be a comprehensive history of our family; please do add anything you think I have left out.)
(This is the first of what I hope will be a comprehensive history of our family; please do add anything you think I have left out.)
No comments:
Post a Comment